Anitya - Impermanence
by Rev. Mas Kodani - Los Angeles Senshin Buddhist
Temple
One of, or perhaps the only thing we remember from our days in Dharma School is
the word impermanence; the teaching that everything is in a constant and
unceasing state of flux. Our teachers thought of ingenious ways to show us the
process of change, from growing lima beans and watching them grow, to views of
the changing seasons. Anitya or impermanence is one of the fundamental points
of the Buddha’s awakening experience. But it is not a terribly exciting idea
when we observe change as an exterior event. One begins to wonder what the big
deal is about impermanence. That is until you begin to look at impermanence as
an interior reality as well.
The lotus flower with a thousand petals is a common image in Mahayana Buddhism.
The thousand petals mean a constantly opening lotus, and the lotus is us – what
we really are. To be constantly opening and constantly changing means be-ing
constantly in the present – a difficult task indeed. Our tradition tells us
that only Buddhas live in the present. Buddhists struggle to sense and connect
with this ever-changing present and be nurtured by it. Zen speaks of having the
“beginner’s mind” when one is learning or doing something for the first time,
with no preconceptions of what should be, but only the openness and enthusiasm
for what is taking place. Taoism speaks of growth in plants taking place at the
soft and supple green parts of the plant. All are examples to be applied to an
individual at any age, but especially to those of us who are forty and older
when ways and attitudes begin to crystallize and harden – when the green
branches begin to harden into stiff bark. This is true of individuals, groups
of individuals, and institutions as well. Knowing when to flow with change,
knowing when to resist it, with oneself, with ones children, ones community,
nation, world, etc, is the difficult trick.
Dynastic China speaks of the dynastic cycle of approximately 400 years. Each
Chinese dynasty lasted approximately 400 years. When the Chinese looked back on
their own history, they saw a dynastic pattern of four periods of approximately
100 years each. In the first period, the founders of the dynasty were vigorous
and sincere in their desire to rule wisely and well. New or reformed
institutions were established to bring stability, peace, and prosperity to the
empire. The ruler’s children and grandchildren, although born and raised in a
privileged palace atmosphere, had the example and discipline of the founder.
This first stage is considered the Golden Age of the Dynasty. This is followed
by the second 100 years in which the attractions of palace living become more
important to the rulers and the daily business of governing is increasingly
left to ministers and a growing bureaucracy. It is however still a period
strongly influenced by the memory of the first period. The third period sees
the entrenchment of the bureaucracy, the consolidation of and exercise of their
power, and the increasing corruption of the ruling class. The bureaucracy
forgets the original purpose of benefiting the empire and becomes concerned
with its own preservation and privileges. The fourth period is the period when
both ruling class and ruling bureaucracy fight each other for their own
benefits and power to the detriment of the empire. It is a period of dramatic
changes, attempts at reform, resistance to reform and change, and finally
revolution and the formation of a new dynasty.
This dynastic theory is seen to be applicable not only to empires and nations,
but to groups and individuals as well. All of this is set into motion by the
ability to see change in everything but myself. The awakening to Anitya
(impermanence) then is not so simple and matter-of-fact as we imagine. It is an
awakening of immense importance and meaning – one that is the fundamental
reason for having a temple in the first place, in spite of the paradox that our
temple institutions are plagued with lifetime sinecures and attitudes, of
unchanging ways and means. We are truly wise and foolish, clear seeing and
blind, good and bad, right and wrong, “like a ring which has no end”. Namanda,
Namanda
Gassho, Rev. Mas